Abstract

Real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) are now at the forefront in the optimization of clinical and operational strategies in radiology. As imaging departments face increasing demands for value-based care and cost containment, the integration of health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) provides a practical way to link operational performance with patient outcomes.

This manuscript describes the role of RWD in radiology management, explores methodologies for incorporating HEOR into daily operations, and discusses ways for generating actionable evidence to guide both clinical and business decisions.

Background

The evolution of RWD and RWE has transformed the way evidence is used in healthcare decision-making. While observational data from clinical practice have long informed medical care, the formalization of RWD and RWE under the 21st Century Cures Act in 2016 created a structured pathway for their use in regulatory, operational, and clinical environments.¹ RWD encompasses data generated outside randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including electronic health records, registries, administrative claims, and, increasingly, information captured from mobile devices and biosensors.² When analyzed, these sources yield RWE that reflects the effectiveness of interventions in heterogeneous, real-world populations.

For radiology management, the growing access to RWD creates new opportunities to evaluate imaging workflows, link diagnostic decisions to patient-centered outcomes, and integrate operational metrics into value-based care strategies. Despite this momentum, the use of RWD in radiology operations still varies widely, and the quality of available data can differ significantly between institutions.

The Need for Evidence in Operations Management

Incorporating HEOR into radiology operations addresses the demand for objective evidence to support strategic and clinical decisions. Purchasing decisions for imaging equipment and software are increasingly evaluated based on comparative effectiveness and cost-utility data rather than solely technical specifications. Monitoring patient outcomes through the integration of operational and clinical data helps ensure that imaging protocols align with both diagnostic accuracy and value-based reimbursement requirements.³ Tracking operational success in real time gives departments the ability to identify inefficiencies, measure intervention impact, and benchmark against national standards or internal baselines.⁴ The shift toward value-based care has made RWE essential for demonstrating quality and outcomes to external stakeholders, including CMS programs and ACR registry benchmarks.

Literature Review

RWD consists of data generated outside the controlled environment of RCTs, encompassing clinical, administrative, and patient-reported information.¹ RWE refers to the insights derived from these data to inform practice and policy.² Outcomes research complements RWE by focusing on the end results of healthcare interventions and policies.³ In radiology, outcomes research extends beyond diagnostic performance to include downstream clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and patient experience.⁴ Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), emphasized by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, highlights outcomes most important to patients, including quality of life and functional improvement.⁵

Approaches to Implementing RWD in Radiology

Effective integration of RWD into radiology operations requires deliberate methodological planning. Observational studies, cohort analyses, and pragmatic trials are well-suited to evaluating imaging workflows in real-world settings.⁶ A critical aspect is integrating RWD into business intelligence systems. Linking PACS, RIS, and EHR data into unified dashboards allows managers to visualize workflow metrics, outcomes, and financial indicators in real time. Ensuring the quality and governance of RWD is essential for generating reliable evidence. Standardization, de-identification, and HIPAA compliance, combined with data quality checks and governance policies, strengthen the credibility of findings.

Limitations and Future Work

While this manuscript explores the integration of HEOR into radiology operations, it is not without limitations. The discussion focuses primarily on the conceptual framework and does not include detailed quantitative case studies from specific institutions. Additionally, the variability of RWD sources across different healthcare systems means that implementation strategies will need to be tailored to local infrastructure and governance.

Future work should include multi-center studies that evaluate specific interventions using RWD in radiology settings and assess their impact on both clinical outcomes and operational efficiency. Expanding the evidence base with practical examples and longitudinal analyses will help refine best practices and provide stronger guidance for imaging administrators.

Discussion

Integrating HEOR and RWD into radiology management represents a shift in how departments demonstrate value. Beyond diagnostic accuracy, departments must provide evidence of their contribution to patient outcomes and operational efficiency. Future directions include leveraging AI and machine learning to analyze large-scale imaging and operational datasets, enabling predictive analytics and optimization of workflow efficiency.

Federated data networks and linking imaging biomarkers with longitudinal outcomes will further enhance comparative effectiveness research. However, the value of RWE depends on methodological rigor and governance frameworks.² For example, one hospital department used real-world scheduling and imaging data to reduce MRI turnaround times by identifying bottlenecks in staffing and protocol assignment.

Conclusion

RWD and RWE are essential tools for radiology managers navigating the intersection of clinical excellence and operational efficiency. Incorporating HEOR methodologies enables departments to link operational performance to patient-centered outcomes, support evidence-based purchasing decisions, and contribute to value-based care strategies. The integration of business intelligence systems, robust data governance, and emerging AI capabilities places radiology in a strong position to lead in demonstrating value in a data-driven healthcare environment.

References

1. Makady, A., de Boer, A., Hillege, H., Klungel, O., & Goettsch, W. (2017). What is real-world data? A review of definitions based on literature and stakeholder interviews. Value in Health, 20(7), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.008
2. Sherman, R. E., Anderson, S. A., Dal Pan, G. J., Gray, G. W., Gross, T., Hunter, N. L., LaVange, L., Marinac-Dabic, D., Marks, P. W., Robb, M. S., Shuren, J., Temple, R., Woodcock, J., Yue, L. Q., & Califf, R. M. (2016). Real-world evidence—What is it and what can it tell us? New England Journal of Medicine, 375(23), 2293–2297. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1609216
3. Krumholz, H. M. (2008). Outcomes research: Generating evidence for best practice and policies. Circulation, 118(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690917
4. Jefford, M., Stockler, M. R., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2003). Outcomes research: What is it and why does it matter? Internal Medicine Journal, 33(3), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00302.x
5. Lee, C. I., & Jarvik, J. G. (2014). Patient-centered outcomes research in radiology: Trends in funding and methodology. Academic Radiology, 21(9), 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.01.027
6. Lang, K., & Mack, C. (2014). Using real-world data for outcomes research and comparative effectiveness studies. Quintiles.